„I can’t breathe“ – Magic, Oppression, and Power in Tomi Adeyemi’s Children of Blood and Bone in the Context of #BlackLivesMatter
Lotte Lange (2021)
Countering the “White Fantastic” – Race, Gender, and the Struggle for Power
Fantasy as a literary genre has always been a useful means for exploring current cultural topics. Although the non-diegetic world is often distorted, enlarged, and equipped with magical elements and strange creatures, it is because of its estrangement from “the real world” that the genre is “safer for cultural work around fraught issues such as – although by no means limited to – race” (Young 2). “This is not to suggest that the imagined worlds of Fantasy are separate from reality, but rather that the inclusion of an impossible element – magic, dragons, and the like – constructs rhetorical distance between one and the other,” as Helen Young indicates (2). This rhetorical distance provides Fantasy with the potential to not just imagine any world, but also new versions of this world, to rethink and thus question established notions of thinking, ethical norms, social relations, or systems of power. In the history of Western speculative fiction and popular culture, Fantasy has often been used to maintain a certain imperialist nostalgia, creating alternative worlds characterised by medievalist themes and structures of power which have not changed since colonial times.
Only recently has the genre begun to engage critically with questions of imperialism, colonialism, and their legacy of racism (Young 12). One current example in YA literature is Tomi Adeyemi’s Children of Blood and Bone (CoBaB), a “Black lives Matter-inspired fantasy novel,” as phrased by reviewer Vann R. Newkirk II (37). It tells the story of Zélie Adebola, a maji of the Ikú clan with the magic powers of a reaper, who pursues the quest of restoring magic in Orïsha together with her brother Tzain and the princess Amari. Her most dangerous enemy is the leader of Orïsha’s monarchy himself, King Saran, who is not only responsible for the violent death of Zélie’s mother, but also for the disappearance of magic and the degradation, enslavement, and death of the maji and divîners – a compelling allegory for the villainisation and discrimination of Black people and their culture. With a Black female author and two Black female protagonists, CoBaB provides a narrative that offers an intersectional approach to the experiences of both women and people of colour within different social systems and relations of power and oppression.
As Maria Sachiko Cecire convincingly argues in Re-Enchanted: The Rise of Children’s Fantasy Literature in the Twentieth Century, medievalist fantasy in the 20th and 21st century frequently follows the imperialist ideals of conquest and exploration, usually to the disadvantage of marginalised communities in far-away lands. In their use of “white magic,” these texts perpetuate “enchanted versions of the Middle Ages and the ages of Anglo-American colonial expansion” and construe them as innocent regarding their racial implication (Cecire 176). Considering that these narratives often use locality as an indication of colonialist values and white superiority – their cartography centring on regions resembling the British Isles – children’s fantasy offers “the magical Middle Ages as an alternate location for the continued expression of colonialist masculinity and white English superiority” (188) and therefore allows the extension of these systems of thought into the cultural imagination. CoBaB presents a counter-narrative to this predicament. By placing itself in a specifically African tradition in terms of its setting, characters, and mythology, its starting point must differ from European-centred narratives per se.
The Western-coded societies, in contrast, appear only as historical sidenotes to the actual narrative, as they have succumbed to magic which was used as a tool of destruction: “The Britāunîs. The Pörltöganés. The Spãní Empire – all civilisations destroyed because those who had magic craved power, and those in charge did not do enough to stop them” (Adeyemi 82). In part, this is also the motivation for King Saran to destroy the maji and keep them from overpowering him. “For magic to disappear for good, every maji had to die. As long as they’d tasted that power, they would never stop fighting to bring it back” (83) – which is part of Zélie’s motivation for restoring magic in Orïsha. Through the viewpoint of a Black female protagonist and indulging in the rich mythology of the Yoruba spirits, CoBaB shifts the perspective to intersectional experiences in an African context. In depicting a “transparent parable of oppression” (Newkirk 37) and linking the degradation of the maji to the experiences of Black and other marginalised communities, the novel presents itself as a counter-narrative to traditional racialised and white-dominated fantasy literature. It obtains a critical focus on race and power within structures of oppression and domination while pointing out possibilities of structural change. To expose these structures, the following analysis employs a Foucauldian notion of power in CoBaB to demonstrate how the novel engages with the discourse, rhetoric, and motifs of the Black Lives Matter movement (BLM).
Power in Children of Blood and Bone
Structures of power are omnipresent in the narrative; they are interwoven with the broader social and political context as well as with individual encounters of subjects and cannot be thought separately from notions of oppressive forces as well as resistance to these forces. The latter becomes an especially prominent topic during Zélie’s quest to restore magic in Orïsha when her magical powers and the possibility of regaining these powers for all majis in the kingdom introduce a counter-dynamic to the prevailing system of power relations. This produces hope for liberation, or at least a fighting chance against King Saran, while also opposing an entire system of thought which designates her and her people as sub-human. Hence, she does not only fight against the injustice presented in abuse and cruelty against her body, but also against the negation of her identity. To classify these structures, Michel Foucault’s theory of power is particularly helpful, as he is concerned “with promoting change that counters domination and oppression and fosters what he refers to as ‘the work of freedom’” (D. Taylor 2). Next to, and partly intertwined with his detailed studies on the theory of discourse, Foucault examines “pervasive operations of power” (Best and Kellner 68). He distinguishes between three modes of power: the modern forms of disciplinary power and biopower, as well as the premodern sovereign power (Lynch 13). While sovereign power can certainly be attributed to Orïsha’s hegemonic political system, the role of biopower in the form of biopolitics is less obvious and harder to place yet arguably more destructive in its effect for marginalised people.
Limits of Sovereign Power – Ruling Orïsha
Following Foucault, structures of power are not to be seen as linear but rather as a diffuse system interlacing every part of society and social practices: “every human relation is to some degree a power relation. We move in a world of perpetual strategic relations” (Politics 168). In his work on The History of Sexuality, he defines power as a “multiple and mobile field of force relations, wherein far-reaching, but never completely stable, effects of domination are produced” and which shall replace the privilege of sovereignty (102). In this sense, power is multifaceted and plural, its source, location, intensity, and effect are in a state of constant fluctuation. Although he relates these aspects of power distinctly to modern society in a very postmodern perspective, they are still valuable for Adeyemi’s novel, which, by being set in the fantastical world of Orïsha, portrays a social structure marked by medievalist rather than modern or postmodern elements. Because the production and publication of the text clearly presents analogies to current socio-political issues, these modes of power can coexist with examples of sovereign power in the narrative. Sovereign power is “a juridico-legal power to kill” (C. Taylor 43) and can be understood, for example, as the absolute and unlimited ability of a monarch to impose orders onto their subjects.
King Saran’s rule over Orïsha functions accordingly as an exercise of sovereign power that is confronted with and destabilised by social and political unrest, emphasising the limits of his authority. He demonstrates his power by constantly posing a threat to the lives and safety of the maji and those who affiliate with them or oppose him in other ways. While there are several instances in which this threat is posed by Saran himself, most often it is executed by his guards. These scenes are continuously marked by expectations or direct encounters of violence:
Though we’re only young girls, he [the guard] keeps his hand on the pommel of his sword. (Adeyemi 9)
[A] disgusting smile crawls onto the drunk guard’s face. He reaches for my [Zélie’s] wrist, […] wraps his pudgy hands around my neck and presses me against the wooden wall. (51)
Her [Amari’s] eyes fill with a terror that is all too familiar. Because when they catch her, it’s not a matter of whether she’ll die, it’s only a question of when: On the spot? Starving in the jails? Or will the guards take turns passing her around? (58)
“You [Yemi] want to stay silent?” Kaea hisses. “Stay silent and you die!” (107)
As these passages make clear, violence is not only specifically directed at the divîners and those who sympathise with or assist them, but also often sexualised in the intersectional experiences of Zélie and Amari, among others, which demonstrates how they are part of multiple power relations at once. Partly as a gesture, partly literally and physically used for these encounters, is “the sword or the threat of death” – Foucault’s symbol of sovereign power (C. Taylor 43).
CoBaB demonstrates the waning of this sovereign power through the social and political discontent which arises as a response to the degradation and violence. This movement from sovereign power to more complex and plural modes is analysed by Foucault, who declares the new, modern, forms of power to be productive, that is, to include the exertion of resistance and therefore “ceaseless struggles and confrontations” which “sometimes strengthen the power relations, but sometimes weaken or reverse” them (Lynch 25). In Orïsha, the violent public executions no longer function as a means of inducing fear and discouraging the people from violating the social and political order, but rather invoke rage and resentment (D. Taylor 3). When Zélie remembers the image of her mother’s corpse hanging from a tree, she thinks “about the king who took her away” (Adeyemi 1); her father, having just experienced the destruction of his village, asserts that as long as magic is not available as a counterforce, “they will never treat us with respect. They need to know. They need to know we can hit them back. If they burn our homes. We burn theirs, too” (99). For Foucault, resistance is a fundamental element of power relations:
there cannot be relations of power unless the subjects are free. If one or the other were completely at the disposition of the other and became his thing, an object on which he can exercise an infinite and unlimited violence, there would not be relations of power. In order to exercise a relation of power, there must be on both sides at least a certain form of liberty. […] That means that in the relations of power, there is necessarily the possibility of resistance, for if there were no possibility of resistance – of violent resistance, of escape, of ruse, of strategies that reverse the situation – there would be no relations of power. (“Ethics” 12)
Consequently, in challenging the existing regime the maji and divîners also convey relations of power. Power in this sense is not only a force coming from above, but also from below, indicating an ambiguity and relationality that require consideration of the macro- as well as the micro-levels of social and political structures, especially with regards to biopower.
Biopower, Racism, Magic
Whereas sovereign power is demonstrated by the right to kill, the right to manage death, biopower is the management of bios; of life or lives. As Foucault notes, “the ancient right to take life or let live was replaced by a power to foster life or disallow it to the point of death” (History 138, emphasis in the original). Hence, as Chloë Taylor explicates, death is at once the ultimate expression of sovereign power and, under biopower, the moment in which power can be escaped (48-9). Closely linked to biopower is Foucault’s concept of biopolitics. With this term he describes the attempt “to rationalize the problems presented to governmental practice by the phenomena characteristic of a group of living human beings constituted as a population: health, sanitation, birthrate, longevity, race (Foucault, “Biopolitics” 73). This political structure would be based on “a power bent on generating forces, making them grow, and ordering them” rather than imposing their destruction (History 136). In The History of Sexuality, Foucault argues that the management of life under biopolitics necessitates the removal of harmful elements to existence – yet “the existence in question is no longer the juridical existence of sovereignty; at stake is the biological existence of a population” (137). In this case, the elimination of individual human beings or an entire population becomes justified not only to secure the survival of society as a whole but also to maintain the right to kill. “If genocide is indeed the dream of modern powers, this is not because of a recent return of the ancient right to kill; it is because power is situated and exercised at the level of life, the species, the race, and the large-scale phenomena of population” (137).
This becomes exceedingly clear when Zélie confronts Inan about his father, King Saran. Inan insists that his father is “trying to protect his people. He took magic away so Orïsha would be safe” (Adeyemi 311, emphasis mine). In his opinion, the elimination of the maji is considered crucial in the attempt to restore the kingdom of Orïsha. Their violent death may be equated with the extraction of a tumour that has to be removed in order to restore the health of an organism. When Zélie vigorously contests Inan’s defense of his father, he goes on: “He did what he thought was right. […] But he wasn’t wrong to take magic away. He was wrong for the oppression that followed.” Zélie protests: “Our lack of oppression and our lack of power are one and the same, Inan” (311). The oppression of the maji is justified with their ostensible harmfulness to society. Their constant degradation is expressed through slurs, physical violence, even enslavement; their language and practices are outlawed, their physical appearance marked undesirable. “We are the people who fill the king’s prisons,” asserts Zélie. “The people Orïshans try to chase out of their features, outlawing our lineage as if white hair and dead magic were a societal stain” (27). The distinctive racism displayed here is marked by Foucault as a precondition for biopower, granting states and communities the power to kill – not necessarily as actual murder, but also via the exclusion from society that Zélie experiences (Sarasin 176, C. Taylor 50). Racism, then, is a regulatory mechanism inherent to biopolitics. As Joseph Winters explicates in his humanist approach to the topic, it is “a ‘caesura within the biological continuum’ that enables the State and its subjects to make distinctions between those worthy of life and those who deserve death.” While Foucault prioritises a European-centred view in his writings on racism, he acknowledges its roots in colonial genocide and how European modernity relies on “colonial terror and anti-black violence” (Winters). Accordingly, the oppression of the maji in the novel must also be read as a reference to current displays of racial violence and Black protest.
Children of Blood and Bone as a BLM Narrative
Structures of power in CoBaB are primarily presented in terms of oppression and resistance to oppression, performing a clear allegory to the struggle of Black people and the fight to stop their marginalisation. One of the most prominent movements in this context is BLM, a global organisation founded in 2013 in response to the death of the Black teenager Trayvon Martin, whose murderer, George Zimmerman, was not held accountable. Their self-proclaimed mission is to “eradicate white supremacy and build local power to intervene in violence inflicted on Black communities by the state and vigilantes” (“About”). In her author’s note, Adeyemi decidedly frames her novel with a similar motive, “Children of Blood and Bone was written during a time where I kept turning on the news and seeing stories of unarmed black men, women, and children being shot by the police. I felt afraid and angry and helpless, but this book was the one thing that made me feel like I could to something about it” (526). CoBaB functions in this sense as a Black protest novel, iterating the key issues of BLM in literary form.
Oppression of the Racialised Other
Right from the beginning of the narrative, CoBaB declares the maji to be other, to be inherently different from the kosidán who do not have the potential for magic. This othering is hierarchical, as it is embedded in a socio-political system of power relations that positions the maji as inferior. “She thinks because I’m a divîner, I’m beneath her,” remarks Zélie in reference to Yemi, the girl she must defeat in their training with the staff (Adeyemi 4). Significantly, in this first comparison of Zélie as a representative of the maji and divîners to a kosidán, their difference in complexion is specifically pointed out and related to inequities of class and colour:
This close to Yemi, the only thing I see is her luscious black hair, her coconut-brown skin, so much lighter than my own. Her complexion carries the soft brown of Orïshans who’ve never spent a day laboring in the sun, a privileged life funded by hush coin from a father she never met. Some noble who banished his bastard daughter to our village in shame. […] Yemi’s features stand out in the crowd of divîners adorned with snow-white hair. (4, emphasis mine.)
Although none of the Orïshans are characterised with light skin, some are lighter. The divergence in skin colour is perpetually emphasised in relations of social and political power. As Amari points out, her mother – the queen – describes another princess as “regal” while “the word ‘lighter’ hides behind her lips” (Adeyemi 36). As Marvin Walter argues, this process of othering is based on the hegemonial system of power through which the perception of the maji is determined, “excluding them from their construction of humanity by creating a discourse of otherness and monstrousness” (8). They are feared because of their magic, made into monsters – following the moral judgment that magic “is the source of all evil” (Adeyemi 43) – and associated with animals; the term “maggot” is continuously used as a slur and thereby operates in its connotation with animality as a signal of exclusion, classifying the maji as sub-human.
CoBaB thus parallels verbal and physical mechanisms of degradation with real instances of oppression, alluding to the marginalisation of women and people of colour in contemporary Western culture. Drawing the connection to BLM and #MeToo, Walter locates a root cause of these issues in the way notions of being human are constructed: although the maji are fitted with magical abilities, in their function as an allegory for oppressed groups they argue for an inherent quality to being human, thus staying inside a humanistic framework (11). Consequently, Inan can realise Zélie’s right to live only when recognising her as a human being: “I can’t bring myself to move. Not when all I see is the scared and broken girl. It’s like seeing her for the first time: the human behind the maji” (286). In thematising the designation of a group of people as less than human, the novel subverts the claims for othering made by a hegemonic system of power. The maji’s resistance to these structures mirrors the claim of BLM which calls, just like Martin Luther King did, for a “massive dislocation that would confront the systems of power” (Johnson 111) when they state: “We affirm our humanity, our contributions to this society, and our resilience in the face of deadly oppression,” (“About”) – the latter far too often coming from the side of law enforcement, even in Orïsha.
Police Brutality and a History of Slavery
“If you cried for Zulaikha and Salim, cry for innocent children like Jordan Edwards, Tamir Rice, and Aiyana Stanley-Jones. They were fifteen, twelve, and seven when they were shot and killed by the police,” Adeyemi writes in her Author’s note (526). Her list is of course far from complete. Following the statistics of the Police Shooting and Crime Database that launched in the same year as BLM, on average, three people are fatally shot by the police every day, leading to 1065 deaths in 2020 alone (“Police Shooting”). In relating her novel to the prevailing condition of white supremacy in the case of police shootings, Adeymi draws attention to unjust violence enacted against people of colour. CoBaB translates the oppression of Black people by law enforcement to the experiences of Zélie as a divîner. She recognises that her brother Tzain, a kosidán, cannot understand her situation, as he does not know what it is like to be her, “to walk around in a divîner’s skin. To jump every time a guard appears, never knowing how a confrontation will end” (Adeyemi 48). As the often sexually directed violence in later scenes clarifies, her gender also puts her at a higher risk, relating to the fact that women of colour are among the primary targets of police violence (Schenwar et al. 5).
The excessive difference in perception and experience of law enforcement in form of the king’s guards is specified by Zélie in a debate with Inan on whether she can trust the guards: “The same guards who chained my mother by her neck? The guards who beat my father half to death? The guards who grope me whenever they have a chance, just waiting for the day they can take everything when I am forced into the stocks?” (Adeyemi 311-2). This leads her to the crucial realisation that in the existing system of power, she continues to be considered a disposable body, living in perpetual fear. “They will always hate me in this world. I will always be afraid.” (312). Inan cannot grasp this concept, as he has never been subjected to this kind of oppression. In his point of view, the guards “are good” and they “keep Lagos safe” (312). Yet, he fails to acknowledge that this world, this structure of power was built for him and his kind, thus only working for his advantage at the expense of others. In the same way, law enforcement has always maintained a system of “exclusion and exploitation that kept (and keep) Black people from accessing social, economic or political power” (Garza viii), normalising “horrific events of antiblackness” that include anti-Black violence, Black death at the hands of the police, and structural racism in the 21st century.
Another subject taken on by the novel is the enslavement of the maji to the kosidán: after the Raid, the massacre of the maji, the survivors are being “starved, beaten, and worse, the divîners are transported like cattle. Forced to work until [their] bodies break” (Adeyemi 28). When Amari first encounters the “children in chains” who work in the stocks, she is shocked at her previous ignorance: “I never considered where they came from, where else they might have ended up” (198). The fictionalisation of slavery entails crucial ethical questions of literary representation, as Ashraf Rushdy notes (236). CoBaB imagines slavery as the beginning of a conversation on privilege, (white) supremacy, and othering that allows the justification of torture, murder, and enslavement. But it is also an “unflinching depiction” of “African complicity in slavery,” as Kathleen Murphey asserts, as well as an appeal to closely observe what the exploitation of people of colour in the history of the West means for their present and their future (110; 114).
The Motif of ‘Breath’ and ‘Breathing’
The motif of ‘breath’ and ‘breathing’ in CoBaB offers yet another way of accessing structures of power and oppression. The novel uses the symbol of ‘breath’ to envision both life and death, magic, love, the connection to the deities, as well as power and oppression. As a literary symbol, ‘breath’ and ‘breathing’ is associated first and foremost with life, love, and the soul, but also with death, the wind, language, and artistic inspiration (Haekel 28). In CoBaB, the motif accordingly serves as an indicator for life and death, revealing Zélie’s connection to her sister deity Oya who bestows her with the “power over death” (Adeyemi 160). ‘Breath’ in its reiteration in the narrative serves as a signal for magic and thus for relations of power and resistance: “One day magic breathed. The next, it died” (15, emphasis in the original). The relation of living, breathing, and magic is emphasised at several points in the novel: “[Sky Mother’s] spirit swells through me like lightning breaking through a thunder cloud. It’s more than the feeling of breathing. It’s the very essence of life,” describes Zélie (257, emphasis mine). After using her magic again, Mama Agba declares: “I feel like I can breathe again” (91). Zélie later confirms this notion: “It’s like breathing again for the first time” (170). Even the hair of Zélie’s mother is attributed with ‘breathing’ and ‘thriving,’ linking the life-affirming quality of breath with magical abilities (1). Magic is understood to be the “very essence and breath of life” (43) and as enabling survival in the form of resistance.
The motif of ‘breath’ also provides multiple connotations in its symbolic structure to the religious concepts of the Yoruba that inform the novel’s mythology. Nature personified as Olodumare also bears the name “Elemii,” the “Owner of the breath of life” (Karade 29). In addition, Zélie’s sister deity Oya is specifically attributed with the “Winds of change” while her physiological correspondences are the lungs and bronchial passages (38-9). She is recognised for her “psychic abilities to manifest in the wind,” again accentuating the proximity of magic and air as an extension of breath (35). While she is often associated with being the deity of death, “upon deeper realization, she’s the deity of rebirth, as things must die so that new beginnings arise” (35). With Zélie’s abilities as a reaper to control the dead, she embodies Oya’s characteristics and furthers them. As one of the driving forces behind the revolt against the sovereign power of the monarchy, she brings forward the possibility of change. In this, the magic of death and life is also linked to protest, to regeneration and liberation. Therefore, the novel also draws attention to the lack of breath in combination with the suppression of magic. Especially Inan observes “how much it hurts to breathe” when he pushes his magic away (301).
The absence of breath connects the novel to the history of the BLM movement and specifically to police brutality. One of the phrases that is used in the protests against police brutality is “I can’t breathe,” uttered by Eric Garner and George Floyd right before succumbing to deadly police restraints. According to the New York Times, the same three words have been recorded in at least 70 cases of Black deaths through the hands of law enforcement in the US (Baker et al.). Zélie uses the phrase twice, and although her life is not in immediate danger, both instances imply the proximity of state violence directed at her. First, by the guards collecting taxes, who pose a threat to the divîners: “For a moment I can’t breathe. I don’t think anyone can” (8). The second time, Zélie becomes aware just how deeply her life is impacted by the constant fear of violent assault by the guards: “I am always afraid. […] I can’t breathe. I can’t talk” (312). The lack of breath thus is distinctly associated with the terror of oppression. In other scenes, the forceful deprivation of breath is presented by physical damage to her throat (11, 403). In this sense, ‘breath’ is equated not only with survival, but with autonomy and protest. In social structures of power that deny a certain group of people the right to live, breathing becomes an act of rebellion.
Conclusion: Envisioning Progress
The motif of ‘breath’ has been used in the rhetoric of BLM and similar movements to emphasise the often deadly discrimination against Black people, yet it has also come to bear a perspective for change: The Breathe Act, an omnibus bill proposed by the Movement for Black Lives, “offers a radical reimagining of public safety, community care, and how we spend money as a society” in response to the striking injustice of the current system (“Learn More”). The symbolic structure of ‘breath’ therefore contains a future dimension, a prospect of hope for a reconstruction of the legal system and social structures of power that are not based on exclusion but on compassion. “We are working for a world where Black lives are no longer systematically targeted for demise,” reads a statement by BLM (“About”). It is necessary to rethink the categorisation of the human and question mechanisms of othering in cultural understanding. CoBaB contributes to this by deliberately placing itself in the context of the BLM movement and representing analogies to the real struggle and history of black people and communities. In portraying racialised violence and systemic racism as a product of biopolitics, as well as by including references to police brutality and notions of slavery, the novel emphasises the role of literature in generating empathy for key issues of contemporary politics and culture. It thus contemplates specific ethical concerns of power and community while conveying the demand to speak up against othering, which expresses itself through the suppression of minorities and the traditional degradation of people and classes demeaned as subhuman.
The novel subverts the traditions of the fantasy genre: instead of maintaining a colonial fiction, it pays close attention to the role of protest and the reversal of power structures without downplaying the effects of marginalisation. It proves that we urgently need “new mythologies: new ‘stories about stories’” (Thomas 8). Despite the frequent dismissal of speculative fiction – especially texts written for children and young adults – as not serious or political enough, the genre has proven to bear significant insight for analysis (Schalk 145) and a potential to change the metanarratives of our culture. Movements like BLM benefit from literary forms such as the novel to negotiate “the real with the potentiality of the un-real” and to enchant readers “with an anti-racist, queer and trans affirming vision of the future” (Haddad 51). The genre of the fantastic in particular enables the production of new cultural myths by pointing out the instability of seemingly fixed rules: “The nonrealism of the texts takes us outside of our rules of reality in order to draw attention to how these rules, which eventually become naturalized assumptions and understandings, are mutable and contextual, rather than fixed” (Schalk 139). In the Author’s note, Adeyemi addresses the reader and extends the narrative with a plea: “if this story affected you in any way, all I ask is that you don’t let it stop within the pages of this text,”affirming that “just like Zélie and Amari, we have the power to change the evils in the world” (527).
Works Cited
“About – Black Lives Matter.” Black Lives Matter, blacklivesmatter.com/about/.
Adeyemi, Tomi. Children of Blood and Bone. Henry Holt and Company, 2018.
Baker, Mike, et al. “Three Words. 70 Cases. The Tragic History of ‘I Can’t Breathe’.” The New York Times, 29 June 2020, www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/06/28/us/i-cant-breathe-police-arrest.html.
Best, Steven and Douglas Kellner. Postmodern Theory. Critical Interrogations. Macmillan, 1991.
Cecire, Maria Sachiko. “White Magic: Racial Innocence and Empires of Mind.” Re-Enchanted: The Rise of Children’s Fantasy Literature in the Twentieth Century. U of Minnesota P, 2019.
Foucault, Michel. “The Birth of Biopolitics.” Ethics. Subjectivity and Truth, edited by Paul Rabinow, translated by Robert Hurley and others, Penguin Books, 2000, pp. 73-79.
—. “The Ethic of Care for the Self as a Practice of Freedom.” The Final Foucault, edited by James Bernauer and David Rasmussen, MIT Press, 1987, pp. 1-20.
—. The History of Sexuality, Vol. I. An Introduction. Translated by Robert Hurley, Pantheon Books, 1978.
—. Politics, Philosophy, Culture. Interviews and Other Writings, 1977-1984, edited and with an Introduction by Lawrence C. Kritzman, Routledge, 1988.
Garza, Alicia. “Foreword.” Who Do You Serve, Who Do You Protect? Police Violence and Resistance in the United States, edited by Maya Schwenwar, Joe Macaré and Ala Yu-lan Price, Haymarket, 2016, pp. vii-x.
Haddad Vincent. “Nobody’s Protest Novel: Novelistic Strategies of the Black Lives Matter Movement.” The Comparatist, vol. 42, 2018, pp. 40-59.
Haekel, Ralf. “Atem/Hauch.” Metzler Lexikon Literarischer Symbole, edited by Günter Butzer and Joachim Jacob, 2nd edition, Metzler, 2012, pp. 28-30.
Johnson, Andre E. “Confrontational and Intersectional Rhetoric. Black Lives Matter and the Shutdown of the Hernando De Soto (I-40) Bridge.” The Rhetoric of Social Movements. Networks, Power, and New Media, edited by Nathan Crick, Routledge, 2021, pp. 98-115.
Karade, Baba Ifa. The Handbook of Yoruba Religious Concepts. Weiser Books, 2020.
“Learn More.” The Breathe Act, 1 Feb. 2021, breatheact.org/learn-more/. Accessed 24 April 2021.
Lynch, Richard A. “Foucault’s Theory of Power.” Michel Foucault: Key Concepts, edited by Dianna Taylor, Acumen, 2011, pp. 13-26.
Murphey, Kathleen. “Science Fiction/Fantasy Takes on Slavery: N.K. Jemisin and Tomi Adeyemi.” Pennsylvania Literary Journal, Vol. 10, Iss. 3, 2018, pp. 106-115.
Newkirk, Vann R, II. “Where Fantasy Meets Black Lives Matter.” The Atlantic Monthly, Vol. 321, Iss. 3, 2018, pp. 36-38.
“Police Shooting and Crime Database.” Police Shootings and Crime Statistics in The United States, 2021, killedbypolice.net. Accessed 23 April 2021.
Rushdy, Ashraf H. A. “Slavery and Historical Memory in Late-Twentieth-Century Fiction.” The Cambridge Companion to Slavery in American Literature, edited by Ezra Tawil, Cambridge UP, 2016, pp. 236-249.
Sarasin, Philipp. Michel Foucault zur Einführung. Junius, 2016.
Schalk, Sami. Bodyminds Reimagined: (Dis)ability, Race, and Gender in Black Women’s Speculative Fiction. Duke UP, 2018.
Schenwar, Maya, Joe Macaré and Alana Yu-lan Price. “Introduction.” Who Do You Serve, Who Do You Protect? Police Violence and Resistance in the United States, edited by Schwenwar, Macaré and Price, Haymarket, 2016, pp. 1-6.
Taylor, Chloë. “Biopower.” Michel Foucault: Key Concepts, edited by Dianna Taylor, Acumen, 2011, pp. 41-54.
Taylor, Dianna. “Introduction: Power, Freedom and Subjectivity.” Michel Foucault: Key Concepts, edited by Taylor, Acumen, 2011, pp. 1-9.
Thomas, Ebony Elizabeth. “Toward a Theory of the Dark Fantastic: The Role of Racial Difference in Young Adult Speculative Fiction and Media.” Journal of Language and Literacy Education, vol. 14, no. 1, 2018, pp. 1-10.
Walter, Marvin John. “The Human and its Others: A Posthumanist Reading of Tomi Adeyemi’s Children of Blood and Bone and N.K. Jemisin’s The Fifth Season.” Gender Forum, Iss. 73, 2019, pp. 2-25.
Winters, Joseph. “Humanism and the Human.” The Oxford Handbook of Humanism, edited by Anthony B. Pinn, OUP, 2018. Online edition, no page. Doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190921538.013.14.
Young, Helen. Race and Popular Fantasy Literature. Routledge, 2016.